Skip to main content
Original research · FOIA case 26-23669-F

The PACT Act grant rate is falling.

Independent research; not peer reviewed. Corrections and version notes are published under our Corrections Policy.

We requested the monthly record of every PACT Act disability claim from the Veterans Benefits Administration under the Freedom of Information Act. VBA granted the request in full on July 17, 2026. The data covers 3,810,691 claims received from August 10, 2022 through July 16, 2026. This page publishes the complete dataset and what it shows.

Executive summary

This report publishes the monthly record of every disability compensation claim VA has received and decided under the PACT Act, from the day the law was signed on August 10, 2022 through July 16, 2026. The records were obtained from the Veterans Benefits Administration under FOIA case 26-23669-F, granted in full, and are reproduced without alteration.

Four findings. First, the grant rate is falling: VA granted 78.6 percent of completed PACT claims in the law's first 12 months and 70.2 percent in the most recent 12 full months, a decline of 8.4 points. Second, cumulative denials crossed one million in July 2026 and stood at 1,007,526 by July 16, 2026. Third, August 2023, the deadline month for benefits backdated to the law's signing, remains the largest filing month on record at 181,467 claims. Fourth, VBA states it does not track PACT claims by presumptive condition category or exposure cohort, so the agency cannot report which exposure groups are driving grants or denials.

The dataset passed independent double transcription and matches VA's own published figures on two external anchors, one of them exactly, to the digit. What these records can and cannot support is set out in the methodology and in the questions this dataset cannot answer, below. The full dataset is free to download as CSV or JSON, and a suggested citation is at the end of this page.

Claims received
3,810,691
Aug 10, 2022 to Jul 16, 2026
Claims granted
2,665,059
3,672,585 completed
Claims denied
1,007,526
One million crossed in July 2026
Overall grant rate
72.6%
granted as a share of completed

What the data shows

1

The grant rate has fallen 8.4 points

In the first 12 months of the PACT Act (August 2022 through July 2023), VA granted 78.6 percent of the PACT claims it completed. In the most recent 12 full months (July 2025 through June 2026), the grant rate was 70.2 percent. By calendar year: 2022 at 75.5 percent, 2023 at 75.7 percent, 2024 at 73.4 percent, 2025 at 70.4 percent, 2026 at 70.5 percent. The dataset does not say why. Possible explanations include a shift in claim mix as the earliest and strongest presumptive claims cleared first, but that is interpretation, not something the records establish.

2

More than one million PACT claims have been denied

Cumulative denials crossed one million in July 2026 and stood at 1,007,526 by July 16, 2026. A denial is not the end of the road: most denied claims can be contested through a Supplemental Claim, Higher-Level Review, or a Board appeal, and our appeal deadline calculator shows the filing windows for each lane.

3

August 2023 remains the biggest filing month on record

Veterans filed 181,467 PACT claims in August 2023, more than double a typical month. That was the deadline month to file or submit an intent to file in order to have benefits backdated to August 10, 2022, and the filing surge coincided with that deadline. The records themselves do not attribute motive, but no other documented program change fell in that month.

4

VA says it cannot break the numbers out by exposure type

Our request also asked for the same counts by presumptive condition category and by exposure cohort: burn pits and airborne hazards, the Agent Orange expansion, and radiation. VBA responded that it does not track PACT claims in that form, so no agency-held record can say which exposure groups are driving grants or denials. For a law built around specific exposure presumptions, that is a notable gap in what VA can report about its own implementation.

Monthly grant rate

Share of completed PACT claims granted each month. August 2022 begins with the law itself (August 10), the final month, July 2026, is partial (through July 16), and early months reflect small completion volumes as processing ramped up.

Oct 22Mar 23Aug 23Jan 24Jun 24Nov 24Apr 25Sep 25Feb 26Jul 2650%60%70%80%90%overall 72.6%

Grants and denials by month

Completed claims each month, split into granted and denied. Every month satisfies granted plus denied equals completed exactly.

  • Denied
  • Granted
Oct 22Mar 23Aug 23Jan 24Jun 24Nov 24Apr 25Sep 25Feb 26Jul 260300006000090000120000

The complete dataset

MonthReceivedCompletedGrantedDeniedGrant rate
August 2022 (from Aug 10)40,92210,0106,6133,39766.1%
September 202248,38012,4499,3063,14374.8%
October 202247,50411,8719,4372,43479.5%
November 202246,24912,2329,3812,85176.7%
December 202250,70211,4519,0612,39079.1%
January 202369,54943,50836,9746,53485%
February 202375,63850,10842,2447,86484.3%
March 202393,68951,36640,94310,42379.7%
April 202378,09750,51339,03111,48277.3%
May 202386,74061,81547,21214,60376.4%
June 202382,50765,16150,28214,87977.2%
July 2023105,94865,94250,38915,55376.4%
August 2023181,46783,33662,60620,73075.1%
September 202384,76080,96159,38921,57273.4%
October 202377,32087,10362,76924,33472.1%
November 202368,83888,61563,71124,90471.9%
December 202363,04193,40666,42626,98071.1%
January 202472,696102,61674,47328,14372.6%
February 202472,57594,32068,78525,53572.9%
March 202475,56695,70470,99624,70874.2%
April 202478,50598,66673,89724,76974.9%
May 202481,75994,33170,45323,87874.7%
June 202476,24877,64158,04819,59374.8%
July 202487,13490,20766,36523,84273.6%
August 202492,76684,14860,81823,33072.3%
September 202476,53580,86058,53622,32472.4%
October 202481,63188,52564,46324,06272.8%
November 202471,11674,80054,36120,43972.7%
December 202470,31077,52256,78820,73473.3%
January 202581,10181,61560,00621,60973.5%
February 202573,81778,27956,24622,03371.9%
March 202582,32082,60659,31523,29171.8%
April 202580,46194,08367,58426,49971.8%
May 202579,303103,07871,02432,05468.9%
June 202578,650101,51070,35531,15569.3%
July 202590,659109,62477,07532,54970.3%
August 202590,186102,48572,17430,31170.4%
September 202590,66599,76169,45530,30669.6%
October 202589,365102,92571,64131,28469.6%
November 202573,34681,49156,31625,17569.1%
December 202581,62092,47364,57627,89769.8%
January 202686,16789,27562,93126,34470.5%
February 202684,85486,45060,95525,49570.5%
March 202697,77999,30869,96729,34170.5%
April 202692,54598,53869,37429,16470.4%
May 202687,94986,74461,17225,57270.5%
June 202691,00695,28767,15028,13770.5%
July 2026 (partial)40,70647,86633,98613,88071%
Total3,810,6913,672,5852,665,0591,007,52672.6%

Methodology and validation

The records. We filed a FOIA request with the Veterans Benefits Administration on July 11, 2026 for aggregate monthly counts of PACT Act claims received, granted, and denied from August 10, 2022 forward. VBA Central Office issued a full grant (case 26-23669-F) with no portions withheld. The enclosure is a monthly table covering August 2022 through July 16, 2026, reproduced above without alteration.

Definitions. Grant rate means claims granted divided by claims completed in the same period. Completed counts equal granted plus denied in every month of the enclosure. Received and completed differ within any month because claims take time to process. These are administrative workload flows, not a fixed cohort tracked from filing to decision: claims completed in a month were generally received in earlier months, so a monthly grant rate describes VA's output mix that month and is not an individual veteran's probability of approval. August 2022 begins August 10, the day the PACT Act was signed, and July 2026 is a partial month (through July 16); neither is used as a typical month in any comparison here.

Validation. The dataset passed three independent checks before publication:
  1. Internal arithmetic: granted plus denied equals completed in all 48 months, with no gaps in the monthly series.
  2. Independent double extraction: the enclosure tables were transcribed twice in separate passes and the two transcriptions matched on every value.
  3. External cross-check: cumulative grants in this dataset through March 2026 (2,433,377) match the figure VA published in its public VA PACT Act Dashboard, Issue 55 (April 24, 2026) exactly. Cumulative completions differ from the dashboard by 1.36 percent, which we attribute to differences in how completion types are counted; we disclose rather than adjust for it.
  4. Second external anchor: cumulative completions in this dataset through June 30, 2026 (3,624,719) match the 3,624,719 figure in VA's public PACT Act performance data exactly, to the digit. We recheck this match against VA's published data each time the report is updated.

Limitations. VBA stated it does not track PACT Act claims by presumptive condition category or exposure cohort, so that portion of the request could not be provided. The records also do not include processing times, ratings assigned, appeal outcomes, or any state or regional breakdown. The unit throughout is the claim as VBA counts it: one claim can include several claimed conditions, and a claim counted as granted may contain both granted and denied contentions, so claim counts are not condition counts. The enclosure reflects VBA's records as produced on July 17, 2026; administrative counts can be revised as claims are reclassified, and a later snapshot may not equal these figures. Grant and denial counts measure reported outcomes, not whether each decision was correct; VA's Inspector General has separately reported processing errors in some PACT claims, which our Report Desk covers. The gap between claims received and completed (138,106 over the full period) is an observation from this dataset, not VA's official pending inventory, which is defined differently. Conclusions here are limited to what these records support.

This request and its status are listed in our public FOIA log. For what the PACT Act covers and who qualifies, see the PACT Act tracker. If your PACT claim was denied, the appeal deadline calculator shows your filing windows.

Questions this dataset cannot answer

These are the questions readers most often bring to this data that the records cannot support. Check the list before citing the report.

Why is the grant rate falling?

The records contain outcomes, not causes. A shift in claim mix as the earliest and strongest presumptive claims cleared first is one plausible explanation, but nothing in the enclosure tests it, and we do not assert it.

Which exposures or conditions drive the grants and denials?

VBA states it does not track PACT claims by presumptive condition category or exposure cohort. No record held by the agency answers this, which is itself finding 4 of this report.

What are an individual veteran's odds of approval?

These are workload flows, not a cohort tracked from filing to decision. A monthly grant rate describes VA's output mix that month and is not any one claim's probability of success.

Were the decisions correct?

Grant and denial counts measure reported outcomes, not decision quality. VA's Inspector General has separately reported processing errors in some PACT claims; our Report Desk covers those findings.

How long do PACT claims take?

The enclosure contains no processing times, no ratings assigned, and no appeal outcomes. The gap between claims received and completed is not a measure of processing time.

How many PACT claims are pending right now?

Received minus completed in this dataset is an observation, not VA's official pending inventory, which is defined differently and published separately.

Source records

Every record behind this report is hosted here, exactly as VA released it, so any figure above can be checked against the agency's own documents.

How to file a FOIA request like this one, step by step

This dataset did not require special access. Any member of the public can request records like these. Here is exactly how this report's request was filed and granted, and how our follow-up request is progressing, so you can reuse the method.

  1. Identify the record custodian. Claims statistics live with the Veterans Benefits Administration, so the request goes to the VBA Central Office FOIA Office. File through VA's FOIA page (va.gov/foia) or FOIA.gov, selecting the Veterans Benefits Administration as the component. Sending a request to the wrong component adds weeks.
  2. Scope the request precisely. Our request asked for "aggregate statistical records on disability compensation claims filed under the PACT Act (Public Law 117-168) from August 10, 2022 to the present," broken out by month, "in native electronic format (Excel or CSV)," and stated plainly: "I am seeking aggregate data only, not records about any individual veteran." A defined subject, a defined date range, a requested format, and an explicit aggregate-only statement each remove a reason for delay or denial.
  3. Request the right fee category and a fee waiver. We requested classification as a representative of the news media and a waiver of all fees, explaining that the records would be published in full, with methodology, at no charge, for public benefit and with no commercial purpose. VBA granted this waiver in this case and again in our follow-up case 26-25137-F. Individuals can also note that the first two hours of search and first 100 pages are typically free for non-commercial requesters.
  4. Know the clock. Agencies owe a determination within 20 business days, though complex requests can be placed on a longer track with notice. This report's request was filed July 11, 2026 and granted in full on July 17, 2026. Our by-station follow-up was acknowledged within days but placed on the complex track, which is normal for larger datasets; the acknowledgement letter, hosted above, shows what that notice looks like.
  5. Read the response for what is not there. A grant letter can contain findings of its own. This one stated that VBA does not track PACT claims by presumptive condition category or exposure cohort. Statements like that define the limits of what the agency can know about its own program, and they belong in the public record alongside the data.
  6. If records are missing, appeal within 90 days. An administrative appeal goes to VA's Office of General Counsel (024), 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, or by email to ogcfoiaappeals@va.gov, with a copy of the decision letter attached, within 90 days of the decision. If the appeal does not resolve it, the Office of Government Information Services (ogis@nara.gov) offers free mediation before litigation. We currently have one such appeal in progress on a separate case, documented in our FOIA log.

This guide describes public procedures under 5 U.S.C. 552 and our own filing experience. It is educational information, not legal advice.

Version history

VersionDateChanges
1.3August 12, 2026Hosted the complete source records (the decision letter and both released monthly tables) and re-verified every published month against them. Added the step-by-step FOIA filing guide and the acknowledgement of follow-up case 26-25137-F (PACT outcomes by deciding station, fee waiver granted, complex track). No changes to the data.
1.2August 2, 2026Added the executive summary, the questions this dataset cannot answer, and this version history. No changes to the data.
1.1August 1, 2026Added a second validation anchor against VA's public PACT Act performance data, clarified that monthly figures are workload flows rather than a tracked cohort, and expanded the limitations on claim counts, snapshot revisions, and decision quality. No changes to the data.
1.0July 20, 2026Initial publication: all 48 months of FOIA data, four findings, methodology and validation, CSV and JSON downloads.

The underlying FOIA dataset has not changed since publication. Any revision to the data itself would require a new agency response and would be recorded here with a new version number.

Balance on the record. The same records behind our critical findings also document what VA is doing well. We publish those numbers with equal rigor in What the Data Shows VA Got Right.

Cite this report

This dataset is free to reference. Copy the citation below and link back so your readers can verify the numbers and download the records.

Morgan, A. (July 20, 2026). PACT Act Claims Report: Grant and Denial Data From FOIA Case 26-23669-F. The Veteran Benefit Desk. ISSN 3144-0835. https://doi.org/10.68077/vbd.pact-act-claims. https://veteranbenefitdesk.com/research/pact-act-claims
Institutional inquiries: for research collaboration, data access, licensing, media requests, or institutional projects, see Research and Partnerships. Institutional services are provided through Aurelis LLC.
This is an educational estimate and not a guarantee of benefits, ratings, or back pay. VA makes all final determinations. We are not a law firm, VSO, accredited claims agent, or VA representative. We provide educational information only and encourage veterans to seek accredited help for individual claim advice. The Veteran Benefit Desk™ is a veteran founded independent digital publication and education platform that helps veterans understand VA disability claims, ratings, evidence, and appeals using clear explanations, original research, and cited public sources.
Printed from The Veteran Benefit Desk, https://veteranbenefitdesk.com/research/pact-act-claims. This copy reflects the page as published; check the canonical URL for corrections and later versions.
We use only strictly necessary, first-party cookies. No advertising or cross-site tracking cookies run on this site. We use limited first-party, cookieless measurement to understand site performance and prevent abuse: no third-party pixels, no ad profiling, and no selling or sharing of personal information for behavioral advertising. We honor Global Privacy Control signals automatically, and if we ever add optional cookies, the choice you save here will govern them. Read our Privacy Policy.